NOW:53146:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
28°
H 28° L 28°
Partly Cloudy | 0MPH
  • Share

New Berlin considers savings, costs of closing elementary school

Consultant says decision could save money

Dean Polenz of New Berlin plays Bingo with his 5-year-old daughter Sophia in Glen Park Elementary School in 2010. The school district is considering closing the school. Photo By PETER ZUZGA

Dec. 20, 2011 | 27 comments

New Berlin - About the only way to catch up on $25 million in deferred maintenance in New Berlin schools without raising taxes is to close an elementary school.

That was the message the New Berlin School Board heard from administrators Monday night. The district has five elementary schools, and a consultant study said it could get by with four, even if all the now-vacant land in the city of New Berlin is developed.

So, the board is eyeing the closing of one of the two smallest and highest performing schools: Glen Park Elementary School, 3500 S. Glen Park Road. That would save an estimated $300,000 per year, facilities consultant IFF estimated. If the building were sold, annual savings could jump to $500,000.

More study time needed

But before making such a decision, the board called for information about potential costs - which could offset some of the savings - at schools that could receive the nearly 300 Glen Park students.

The board also wanted to get a better idea of how much extra capacity each elementary school has to get a better feel for where Glen Park students might end up.

The board could decide on the issue as early as its Jan. 9 meeting. If that decision is for closing, at least two, if not three, other elementary schools would be in line to receive many more students.

Glen Park has two classes per grade from kindergarten through sixth grade. And three elementary schools have room for one more section from kindergarten through sixth grade. So, if Glen Park were closed, two of those three - Ronald Reagan, Elmwood and Orchard Lane - might get 150 Glen Park students. If the 300 Glen Park students were distributed to all three, each could get 100 Glen Park students.

There also is room in some grades at Poplar Creek Elementary School, Superintendent Joe Garza said. If the excess space is at the upper grades, older Glen Park students could transfer there and stay until going on to middle school.

It would seem that the administration will need to know where Glen Park students could end up to predict what improvements each school would need to accommodate the influx of students.

Other impacts of decision

But board member Keith Hastings wanted to know more than where the Glen Park students would go and the resulting costs. Hastings said he is worried about how student achievement might be disrupted.

He called for information about how student achievement was affected after Prospect Hill and New Berlin Center elementary schools were consolidated into Ronald Reagan Elementary School.

Hastings also wanted to know how much could be realized from the sale of Glen Park and how much could be saved in construction and interest costs if the board acted now rather than taking more time.

Roger Dickson, director of financial services, said a decision in January could result in an actual school closing next fall, though that would be a tight time line.

Saying that he didn't want to delay things, Hastings said the other information could come later.

Glen Park's protectors

Once again, Glen Park parents mounted a spirited defense Monday.

Bill Adams said it is unfair to target Glen Park because it needs a lot of catchup maintenance. For years, Glen Park maintenance was left undone, while the district built Ronald Reagan and Elmwood elementary and refurbished Orchard Lane Elementary, he noted.

And parent Rich Tadych said after the meeting that if the schools have so much room, why not close a bigger school that costs more to maintain?

NEXT STEP

WHAT: potential decision on closing Glen Park Elementary School by the New Berlin School Board

WHEN: 7 p.m. Jan. 9

WHERE: New Berlin West idea center, 18695 W. Cleveland Ave.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. 4N6nKM Good post! Found a lot of new and interesting! Will share the link with others:D
  2. What's happening now with the schools is deserved because people didn't know better and didn't
    keep fiscal conservatives from doing this to the school system 10 years ago. They were warned but they didn't believe this is what would happen. You pretty much have to live with it now...the wheels are so far in motion it can't be stopped.
  3. The NBCRG drones seem to forget their own financial guru when they're howling about double dippers.

    The Racine School District certainly got no bargain from his outfit. The article Jayne references refers back to a Journal investigation in 2007 that showed his firm had overbilled Racine at least $125,000 [url]http://www.jsonline.com/news/29347354.html[/url] ("That overpayment alone would have been more than enough to pay the annual salary of a staff budget director who would be charged with finding the same type of savings that the consulting group now wants over $1 million for, according to a Journal Sentinel review of how other school districts in the state operate.")

    New Berlin hired this guy knowing he had taken Racine to the cleaners with the deal he'd worked out there. In fact, they praised him for it.

    Speaking of letting the foxes oversee the henhouse, has the district ever revealed how much it spends on consultants or what consultants they're hiring? Given the number of people and groups they bring in, the outlay has to be tens, if not hundreds of thousands each year. Where is that money going?
  4. Geno53151,

    At the common council meetings the developers estimated only +/-17 kids to live in the complex of 180 units... That sounds like a reasonable projection?! They are building it on federal tax credits, so not sure about the propert taxes..
  5. " Or how about the $150,000/yr the district is paying Roger Dickson for his "expertise", which after hearing him unable to answer even simple questions at the Board meeting is about $150,000 too much."

    JustinK, in addition to that very generous salary don't forget that Dickson is a "double-dipper." He retired as an assistant superintendent from the Kettle Moraine District so he's receiving a state pension. Following his retirement he became the chairman of Public Business Consulting Group. In this capacity, Dickson served as the finance director and consultant for Racine Public Schools from 2006 to 2008. The firm collected $1.6 million over that time for identifying ways Racine Unified could cut costs. The Milwaukee Journal covered this story when Dickeson was hired in New Berlin (http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/42366502.html.) He certainly is a man of "expertise."

    The population explosion of administrators is also pretty ironic given that the BOE implimented the mega-schools with the promise that we would save money by having fewer of them.
  6. In the next 3 years we will know what impact the children of those moving into the low income housing in the city center will have on our schools. Right now, I have not seen one word projecting how it will affect our school system.
    What new taxes will it generate and how they will be used?
  7. Amen Amber. The apathy among this community is truly disappointing. I specifically moved here 6 yrs ago for the strong school systems. Do people not understand the impact of our schools performance on the overall desirability and property values? If New Berlin residents are truly concerned about saving money, where is the outrage over the tens of thousands of dollars spent on these "studies"? Or how about the $150,000/yr the district is paying Roger Dickson for his "expertise", which after hearing him unable to answer even simple questions at the Board meeting is about $150,000 too much. Or what about the additional 10 administration staff hired by Garza just this year? How much is that costing us? But no, everyone is in uproar over the cost of MAINTAINING AN ENTIRE SCHOOL. People need to get their priorities straight, and that certainly includes our elected Board members
  8. So $50 per year isn't worth at least maintaining the value of your home??? The last time I checked New Berlin has a number of bad marks on our reputation... Our mayor calls us names, we can't get anyone to invest in our city center besides the workforce housing and now we can't maintain our school buildings... I live in the GP neighborhood and I don't want to have to drive by a dilapidated building. I'm pretty sure that a big eye sore like that won't help anyone sell their homes. Or go talk to the neighborhood with Weatherstone church?! I'm so tired of the "it's not my neighborhood", "it won't impact my kids", "I don't have kids in the school district" argument. Just wait until its your neighborhood, and I bet at one point it will impact your kids and I'm pretty sure most of the homes in New Berlin at one point had kids in the schools here... What about what is best for our community?? None of that attitude here...
  9. OK, geniuses. How do any of you propose to PAY for all those repairs and keep Glenn Park open? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

    Oh, right. Everyone should have to dig into their pockets a little deeper to the tune of another fifty bucks a year. Hey, it's only fifty bucks. On top of a tax bill that's already in the THOUSANDS.

    Look around you. Lots of unemployment. Under employment. Salaries lower than they were five years ago.

    People have had enough of the whiny soccer mom crap about how "it's only fifty bucks more". Shut it down and move on, so alderman Karvala can stop embarrassing herself by showing up at school board meetings and shooting her mouth off.

    If you haven't seen it watch the Dec 19th meeting. Anyone know what the hell she's talking about? Sounds like she's got some things she needs to get under control.
  10. I agree NBjayne, it is all lip service from this board. .. Last night was a blatant example of that, first said was I want a list of this, that and the other thing... Then ammending that request because it will delay the process past January... Due diligence? Slowing the process? I'm so glad this BOE has the best interests of my kids in the fore front!!!
Load more comments View all comments Back to top
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries