New Berlin - City officials don't want to delve too closely into the touchy area of maintenance rules for homeowners, but they don't like having their hands tied when, say, a home has a tree growing in a gutter.
Corliss Tischer, New Berlin code compliance specialist, recalls such a real-life complaint and how she had to respond to it.
"I have to look at people and say I can't do anything," Tischer said.
A growing concern
Because the city has gotten more complaints than ever, partly because some foreclosed properties aren't being maintained, officials are looking into passing their first home maintenance ordinance since about 1996 - the year single-family homes were removed from the city's property maintenance rules for all but agricultural property.
Currently, there are 38 foreclosed homes in the city out of a total of about 15,000 homes.
To give aldermen more time to consult with constituents, the Common Council last week tabled a proposed ordinance containing the residential maintenance rules. However, there was strong support for approving some kind of rules before spring, when complaints pop up along with the tulips.
If the city does adopt new rules, it's unlikely the city would nit-pick small individual problems, Tischer said. Rather, the city would consider each instance is taken in its totality.
And no one would be driving around looking for violations, either, said Jessica Titel, associate planner. The city will only investigate if an alderman or people who leave their names complain, she explained.
No love for old intrusiveness
Some officials remember those old home repair rules prior to 1996 and are glad they're gone.
Alderman Ken Harenda said he wants to make sure the proposed rules don't open the door for the city to step in when a home's paint is peeling a little or the gutters need to be replaced.
"Years back, the city got intrusive," Harenda said. "How far will this go?"
He still sees the potential for the city to get involved where it shouldn't, for whatever reason.
"I don't think our staff will abuse this, but I've seen it in other communities. I'm looking down the road, I guess," he said.
The other big worry is that residents would use maintenance codes against each other in neighbor feuds. People already try to involve aldermen in neighbor disputes, said Alderman David Ament.
He also worried if the city would become a kind of Big Brother, able to come into peoples' yards and homes to investigate complaints.
But City Attorney Mark Blum said there are many steps to go through before that could happen.
First city employees would try to determine the validity of complaints by looking from sidewalks and streets, he said. If they need a closer look, they would ask the homeowner for permission to come onto the property. If the property owner refused, Blum would evaluate whether there is enough cause to ask the municipal judge to issue a special inspection warrant. Finally, the judge would use his independent judgment.
Any system can be abused, Blum said, but there are hurdles to clear before the city could come onto private property.
E-mail Newsletter
Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.
Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!
More from News and Features
- Werner vacates Muskego alderman seat sooner than expected
- Share your thoughts on Act 10 with NOW using social media (26)
- News & Notes: May 15
- Ike students team up for academic success
- For West student, this camp is simply out of this world
- Muskego recall effort now limited to Werner's seat
- Police Report: May 14
- New Berlin man charged with sexually assaulting his granddaughter
- The trifecta of invasive plant species (2)
- News & Notes: May 7










7 COMMENTS
Chucksa - Feb 20 at 4:43 PM - Report Abuse
A mom - Feb 20 at 4:45 PM - Report Abuse
"Any system can be abused", said Blum. Exactly the problem; why add another system that's got that potential to be abused? "There are hurdles to clear before the city could come onto private property." Sure, but who sets those hurdles and decides if they've been cleared? The city.
If we're talking about 38 houses in foreclosure, that's one-quarter of 1% of the homes in New Berlin. This is not the kind of problem that needs a government solution.
There was a house in foreclosure in our neighborhood a year or two ago. The roof was going bad, the house needed a paint job, the planting beds were weedy messes. Guess what? A young couple bought it and began fixing it up. Problem solved without government intrustion. So we had a bit of an eyesore for awhile. No big deal. Life isn't perfect and this ain't Disneyworld, sweetheart.
MilwIron - Feb 20 at 6:11 PM - Report Abuse
DeathToTyrants2011 - Mar 05 at 7:05 PM - Report Abuse
Yodaknows - Feb 20 at 6:11 PM - Report Abuse
Busby - Feb 28 at 5:15 PM - Report Abuse
You also can't take each case individually like the article suggests - "Rather, the city would consider each instance is taken in its totality." This is too arbitrary and forget about abuse, just the general interpretation from one instance to the next will vary.
It would seem reasonable - though I would have to see it on paper before I'd say I agree - that you could have different "rule sets" for different conditions - ie, vacant vs occupied, owned vs bank owned, zoning based, etc. It is such a fine line though and if it were to go this route - I think it needs explicitly clear definition rather than the arbitrary method suggested.
DeathToTyrants2011 - Mar 05 at 7:04 PM - Report Abuse