NOW:53146:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
64°
H 68° L 37°
Cloudy | 12MPH
  • Print

New Berlin considers new rules for home upkeep

Feb. 20, 2012 | 7 comments

New Berlin - City officials don't want to delve too closely into the touchy area of maintenance rules for homeowners, but they don't like having their hands tied when, say, a home has a tree growing in a gutter.

Corliss Tischer, New Berlin code compliance specialist, recalls such a real-life complaint and how she had to respond to it.

"I have to look at people and say I can't do anything," Tischer said.

A growing concern

Because the city has gotten more complaints than ever, partly because some foreclosed properties aren't being maintained, officials are looking into passing their first home maintenance ordinance since about 1996 - the year single-family homes were removed from the city's property maintenance rules for all but agricultural property.

Currently, there are 38 foreclosed homes in the city out of a total of about 15,000 homes.

To give aldermen more time to consult with constituents, the Common Council last week tabled a proposed ordinance containing the residential maintenance rules. However, there was strong support for approving some kind of rules before spring, when complaints pop up along with the tulips.

If the city does adopt new rules, it's unlikely the city would nit-pick small individual problems, Tischer said. Rather, the city would consider each instance is taken in its totality.

And no one would be driving around looking for violations, either, said Jessica Titel, associate planner. The city will only investigate if an alderman or people who leave their names complain, she explained.

No love for old intrusiveness

Some officials remember those old home repair rules prior to 1996 and are glad they're gone.

Alderman Ken Harenda said he wants to make sure the proposed rules don't open the door for the city to step in when a home's paint is peeling a little or the gutters need to be replaced.

"Years back, the city got intrusive," Harenda said. "How far will this go?"

He still sees the potential for the city to get involved where it shouldn't, for whatever reason.

"I don't think our staff will abuse this, but I've seen it in other communities. I'm looking down the road, I guess," he said.

The other big worry is that residents would use maintenance codes against each other in neighbor feuds. People already try to involve aldermen in neighbor disputes, said Alderman David Ament.

He also worried if the city would become a kind of Big Brother, able to come into peoples' yards and homes to investigate complaints.

But City Attorney Mark Blum said there are many steps to go through before that could happen.

First city employees would try to determine the validity of complaints by looking from sidewalks and streets, he said. If they need a closer look, they would ask the homeowner for permission to come onto the property. If the property owner refused, Blum would evaluate whether there is enough cause to ask the municipal judge to issue a special inspection warrant. Finally, the judge would use his independent judgment.

Any system can be abused, Blum said, but there are hurdles to clear before the city could come onto private property.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50
  1. Is the city going to play fair? Can the citizens demand action when the city fails to maintain it's property as well? Things like grass growing in curbs and gutters, street signs, traffic signals, fire hydrants, etc not being maintained regularly? Or is the city just going to excuse itself because it's not in their budget?
  2. I don't think this is a good idea at all.

    "Any system can be abused", said Blum. Exactly the problem; why add another system that's got that potential to be abused? "There are hurdles to clear before the city could come onto private property." Sure, but who sets those hurdles and decides if they've been cleared? The city.

    If we're talking about 38 houses in foreclosure, that's one-quarter of 1% of the homes in New Berlin. This is not the kind of problem that needs a government solution.

    There was a house in foreclosure in our neighborhood a year or two ago. The roof was going bad, the house needed a paint job, the planting beds were weedy messes. Guess what? A young couple bought it and began fixing it up. Problem solved without government intrustion. So we had a bit of an eyesore for awhile. No big deal. Life isn't perfect and this ain't Disneyworld, sweetheart.
  3. If this is allowed you will be giving the city the right to tell you anything and everything to do with your property......and believe me they will abuse this....
    Hide replies
  4. I have seen this abused in numerous communities. One they come on your property without permission and deny it later or you have a judge who will give them blanket authority to do what they want. In one community I seen a house torn down because the city condemned the house of a family of six because they had too many toys in the front yard and one of the city councilmen actually bragged about this. That family lived in a tent for several months before they moved competely away from that town. It was just too bad the people in that neighborhood were jealous because they had too much money to spend on their kids and their neighbors didn't even have any children. That town today is quickly becoming a ghost town.
  5. A general set of blanket rules should not be applied.

    You also can't take each case individually like the article suggests - "Rather, the city would consider each instance is taken in its totality." This is too arbitrary and forget about abuse, just the general interpretation from one instance to the next will vary.

    It would seem reasonable - though I would have to see it on paper before I'd say I agree - that you could have different "rule sets" for different conditions - ie, vacant vs occupied, owned vs bank owned, zoning based, etc. It is such a fine line though and if it were to go this route - I think it needs explicitly clear definition rather than the arbitrary method suggested.
  6. Wow, you people seem to know everything.
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries